Now you have now read some Derrida.

现在大家已经读了一些德里达的著作。

In Week Four, they started on Derrida.

学到第四个星期，他们开始探讨德里达。

What do you think Derrida might mean?

你认为德里达可能是什么意思？

Derrida was, of course, a central figure in this.

德里达当然是这其中的一个重要人物。

Derrida never really claims that you can do without it.

德里达从来没有说过，不这样做是可以的。

Derrida thought, speak and words were not suretyship of presence.

德里达认为，言语和文字都不是存在的担保者。

There is a complex and subtle relation between Derrida and Heidegger.

德里达与海德格尔之间存在着一种复杂而微妙的关系。

In saying that, I want to move immediately to the differences with Derrida.

说到这点，我想快速地转到德里达的不同点。

A center is both a center and not a center, as Derrida maddeningly tells us.

中心既是中心又不是中心，德里达令人恼火地这样告诉我们。

Now I do want to go back to the relationship between Derrida and Levi-Strauss.

现在我想回到，德里达和列维，施特劳斯之间的关系。

This is a metaphor that Derrida frequently uses, as a kind of writing on the ear.

这是德里达经常用的一个比喻，就像在耳朵上书写。

He follows Jakobson much more consistently in this regard than Derrida does.

他与雅各布森意见一致，在这个方面比德里达与雅各布森的意见更加一致。

This paper discusses a famous debate between Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida.

本文讨论了法国当代重要的两个思想家福柯和德里达的一次争论。

(And remember, you'll get more out of reading Derrida on Plato if you read Plato first.)

(并且要记住，如果你先读柏图的话，你在读德里达对柏拉图的时候就会得到更多)。

It's the only way you'll be able to read anything seriously, whether it's Plato or Derrida on Plato.

这是唯一你能够严肃认真地读些东西的方法，不管它是柏拉图的著作，还是德里达对柏拉图。

So those are some remarks then on the differences and the similarities between DE Man and Derrida.

关于德曼与德里达之间的，不同点和相同点，我要讲的就那些。

As last week's obituaries have already recorded, Derrida was the founding father of deconstruction.

正如上周的各条讣告所记载的，德里达是“解构主义”之父。

The Archaeology of Memory can be seen as a manifestation of the deconstructionism of Jacques Derrida.

《记忆考古》可以说是以作品印象对于德里达“解构”学说的一种表现。

This is not the place for an obituary of Derrida and even if it were, I would not be qualified to write it.

这里不是为德里达发讣告的地方，即使是，我也没有资格写讣告。

So here's what, a little more than halfway down, the left-hand column, page 917, Derrida has to say about that.

所以这里， 中部偏下，第917页左边，德里达说出了自己关于它的看法。

The thesis employs a theory of macroscopical language theory from deconstructive translation proposed by Derrida.

这篇论文引用了宏观语言的说法，这是源于德里达提出的解构主义翻译理论。

For Derrida, meaning depends on the context and can be only fixed temporarily for the context is always changing.

在德里达看来，意义取决于语境，但语境不断变化，因而只能暂时确定意义。

However, meanwhile we are well familiar with the critique of the presence formulated especially by Jacques Derrida.

但与此同时，我们也很熟悉对在场的批判，尤其是雅克·德里达所表述的。

Life lessons, exes, or your philosophical stance on the late Jacques Derrida Overblown fraud or grand deconstructionist?

生命课题、费用、或者你的哲学立场是站在已故的雅克·德里达过分渲染欺骗或是极为重要的“解构”学说？

I have a tendency to put upon texts an inherent authority which is stronger, I think, than Derrida is willing to put on them.

我倾向于把一个固有的权威，放在文本之上，这个权威，我想，比德里达愿意放置的更强大。

Derrida is claiming that language is different in the sense that it makes no sense to talk about it as standing outside of what's going on.

德里达称语言是不同的，因为站在语言之外谈论发生了什么是没有意义的。

Derrida famously, notoriously, said "there is nothing outside the text," right? What he meant by that, of course, is that there's nothing but text.

德里达著名地，恶名昭彰地，说道，文本之外什么都没有“，是吧，当然，他意思就是说，需要考虑的只有文本。”

Deconstruction that Derrida reaches is the crystallize of Frerich contemporary thought, and it is also an important presentation of the post-modernism.

德里达的解构主义是法国当代思想的结晶，也是后现代主义的一个重要代表。

In the academic circles, both Derrida and the Yale School are considered as deconstructionism with the differences between them almost totally neglected.

学术界常把德里达与耶鲁学派一起称为解构主义，忽视了二者的区别。