P.S. Earlier this week, I did a TV interview and wrote an op-ed on this topic.

本周初，我做了一个电视采访，并谢了这个专题的论坛版。

Please see the attached my op-ed piece arguing that the world is heading towards stagflation.

请阅览我后附专栏文章，该文论证世界正处于滞涨的通道之中。

Julie was intrigued when someone in HR told her about a workshop offered at Stanford by the Op-Ed Project.

当人力资源部的一个人告诉她关于斯坦福大学论坛版项目提供的一个研讨会，朱丽感到好奇的。

Reading five Web sites, an op-ed article and a blog post or two, experts say, can be more enriching than reading one book.

专家说，浏览五个网站、一篇专栏文章、一两篇博客文章所获取的信息量远胜于阅读一本书。

After attending and getting positive feedback about her ideas, Julie tried something she had never thought to do before: write an op-ed.

参加了研讨会之后，她的想法也得到了积极的反馈，朱丽试着去做一件她之前从未想过的事：写专栏。

Using a traditional newspaper layout, it parodies and makes fun of traditional newspapers with opeditorials, op-ed pieces, and street-talk interviews.

它采取传统报纸的版面样式，用新闻报道、社论、专栏和街头访谈来恶搞和嘲弄传统纸媒。

I wanted to gauge your interest in authoring an op-ed this week for a top-tier media outlet on an important issue that I know you're following closely.

我想知道你有没有兴趣在这个星期撰写关于某顶级媒体一项重要问题的评论文章，我知道你一直对此类事件非常关注。

In his blog critique of a Financial Times op-ed I wrote in June 2010, Krugman no longer argued that Fannie and Freddie could not buy sub-prime mortgages.

在他博客里，他批判了我写在财经时代评论的2010年6月的文章，克鲁格曼不再认为范尼梅和弗雷德马克能够购买次贷抵押。

To explain why, let me answer a rhetorical question posed by Professor John Taylor of Stanford University in a recent op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal.

为了解释其中的理由，我先回答斯坦福大学教授约翰·泰勒最近在《华尔街日报》发表的一篇文章中提出的一个反问。

If you want to circulate detailed information, you will probably have to do it through newsletters, op-ed page features, projects with schools, conferences, workshops, and websites.

如果你想不断反复的传播细节信息，你可能不得不通过通讯，海报，学校项目，会议，专题研讨会以及网站上来实现。

Still, he admits to turning bullish on American shares, like another great investor, Warren Buffett, who last week wrote an op-ed in the New York Times advising people to buy them now.

尽管如此，他和另一位伟大的投资者沃伦巴菲特一样，认为美国股市将重回佳境。

Perkins wrote about his views on governance in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in 2007, expressing his belief in a model that is very different from a "Compliance Board, with its focus on legal issues."

2007年，珀金斯曾在《华尔街日报》一个专栏中发表过关于公司治理的文章，他在文中表示，自己支持的模式，与专注于法律问题的合规董事会有非常大的不同。